Making Her Mark – Self Portraits VI

On By ResaIn Making Her Mark

Welcome to the final instalment of Making Her Mark – Self Portraits. I’m here with Rebecca Budd, curator of Chasing Art. 

Resa – So, Rebecca, in this last Self Portraits post, we are headed to the Netherlands, 17th century, to visit another artist that I had never heard of. Had you heard of Judith Leyster before this post?

Rebecca – Yes – just recently. I discovered her when I travelled virtually to the Rijksmuseum. Judith Leyster was featured in their Women of the Rijksmuseum exhibit two years ago. It was an eye-opening experience to discover her work.

Resa – Very Cool, I’m excited to se what you’ve dug up!

Once Forgotten Dutch Master

Judith Leyster, the once-forgotten Dutch master, has experienced a resurgence in recognition. She was commemorated in a  Google Doodle, her artwork achieved higher- than-expected prices at auction, and she was featured in the most prestigious chamber of the Rijksmuseum.

Who Was Judith Leyster

A remarkable Dutch painter of the 17th century, Judith Leyster was born 1609, in Haarlem, Netherlands. The daughter of a brewer, she displayed a precocious talent for painting from a young age.

By the age of 24, Leyster had achieved the remarkable feat of becoming a member of the Haarlem painters’ guild, marking her official recognition as a masterful artist. She was one of the rare professional women painters of her time, being one of only two women accepted as a master in Haarlem’s painters’ guild during the entire 17th century Netherlands.

Leyster’s artistic talent quickly gained recognition, and she became known for her lively and expressive compositions, often depicting genre scenes, portraits, and still life paintings. Her work radiated a sense of spontaneity and skillful use of light and shadow, showcasing her technical prowess and innovative approach to painting.

Leyster’s artistic pursuits defied conventions, as she ventured beyond the typical subject matter embraced by Dutch painters of her time. Her work encompassed a diverse range, and she was among the pioneering artists who explored and popularized the domestic genre scene, portraying everyday life with a fresh perspective.

In the early 1630s, before her marriage to the lesser-known artist Jan Miense Moleanaer, Leyster produced some of her most significant works. However, despite her talent and dedication to her craft, her contributions to art history remained largely unrecognized until the late 19th century.

Judith Leyster Rediscovered

The rediscovery of Leyster’s significance in the art world came about during a lawsuit between an art dealer and his vendor.

It was revealed that many works attributed to her contemporary and rumoured rival, the great Dutch painter Frans Hals, were, in fact, Leyster’s creations that had been incorrectly credited. This significant discovery brought long-overdue attention to Leyster’s remarkable talent and her influential role in shaping the Dutch Golden Age of art.

It is remarkable how the true authorship of artworks can be uncovered through careful examination and historical investigation. The discovery of Leyster’s initials hidden beneath a faked signature of Frans Hals in “The Happy Couple” (aka The Carousing Couple) serves as a testament to her enduring impact on art history and the need for ongoing reassessment of attributions.

This revelation not only sheds light on Leyster’s artistic contribution but also prompts a re-evaluation of artworks attributed to her contemporaries. It further underscores the significance of ongoing research in uncovering the often overlooked achievements of pioneering artists.

Resa – When searching for other female artists from the past whose art has been misattributed, I found an intriguing article (July/2024) in  Daily Art Magazine. The article cites 5 female artists.

“This systematic misattribution essentially meant the erasure of women from the art historical canon, which eventually resulted in their erasure from history itself.”

Rebecca, do you think it’s possible that as art experts and historians uncover yet more misattributed art that we could see some famous paintings by famous artists, the Rembrandts, Da Vincis, et al being reattributed to women?

Rebecca – You have asked a very insightful question, Resa! It’s certainly possible. As more art is studied works that have been misattributed may be finally recognized as contributions of women artists. It would be a significant shift in how we view art history. I truly believe that we are now embarking on an extraordinary exploration of art history. It gives me great comfort that we are seeking to foster a richer and more equitable understanding of the artistic legacy we inherit. I am glad that you mentioned the Daily Art Magazine. It is one of my go-to places to learn about art.

Judith Leyster’s Self Portrait: A Glimpse into the Artist’s World

Judith Leyster’s self-portrait offers a glimpse into her life and artistry. Created before her admission to the guild in 1633, the portrait encapsulates a moment of confident creativity and engagement. Leyster’s self-assured expression, characterized by a confident smile and parted lips as if to speak, exudes a sense of self-assurance and mastery. The casual pose, with one arm nonchalantly resting on the back of her chair, hints at the artist’s ease and comfort in her own studio.

It is difficult to photograph art. I captured many works beautifully. However, this painting was the finale of the show, and was heavily lit with warm light. 

Shot on an angle, the lighting was evaded, and it seems to be closer to many photos of it. Still, it seems no 2 photos are the same.
Photos in this post © Resa McConaghy

The liveliness and freedom evident in Leyster’s brushwork mirror her spirited approach to art, capturing a fleeting pause in her work as she glances toward a potential visitor. This subtle interaction suggests a moment of connection with a viewer, possibly a patron, inviting them to share in the experience of a work in progress.

In this self-portrait, Judith Leyster not only presents herself as a skilled artist but also provides a glimpse into the vibrant and dynamic world of creativity that she inhabited.

Today, Judith Leyster is celebrated for her creative spirit, artistic innovation, and lasting impact on the history of art. Her legacy continues to inspire and engage art enthusiasts and scholars around the world.

Resa – Well, Rebecca, so ends our series on Self Portraits. It’s been a pleasure and an honour having you here with me. Thank You!

I look forward to your return, to discuss some engravings on paper by Catherine Brandinn and Geertruydt Roghman. These are of utmost interest as the images depict the working poor, not a big subject of artists in those times.

Rebecca – Thank you, Resa! It has truly been a privilege to explore these amazing women through “Making her Mark” with you. Your photographs allowed me to virtually experience the joy of viewing these paintings. Thank you for celebrating and honouring these artists. Their resilience and creativity continue to inspire and empower us today, even as they provide a vital legacy for future generations of women in the arts.

I’m eagerly anticipating our next discussion on the engravings by Catherine Brandinn and Geertruydt Roghman, as the portrayal of the working poor offers a unique and important perspective that, I believe, deserves more attention in the art world.

As you say so eloquently, “Art Remembers Us.”

Click on X to see research links & a fabulous video on her

204 thoughts on “Making Her Mark – Self Portraits VI”

  1. In the times of when men are valued way higher than women, it’s only, reasonable, that these female artists, writers of their times, needed to, paint, write, create under , pseudonyms, for the world to, accept and note their works, and, only in these, past few hundreds of years, like from 1800, 1900 on to current day, are the women, standing under the spotlights for their, excellent, artistic, expressions. We have come a long way, sure, but, there’s still, a long, long way to, go, until the genders are, completely, equal, and that’s not, happening, any time, soon, but we’re, getting there, very, slowly…so, we’re still, making, progress, and that, is what’s, important.

    1. Yes, that is important. It’s terrific that Leyster and other women are getting credit for what they did and what they contributed to society through the arts and other areas.

      Thank you for your considerate comment!

    2. I am delighted that you enjoyed this post!!! Every act of creativity adds to the story of humanity. Your comments reminded me of another artist, Sonia Delaunay, multi-disciplinary abstract artist. “I love creation more than life, and I must express myself before disappearing.” It is a reminder that we must embrace our creative spirit. Judith Leyster did it in her time. Now, it’s our time!

  3. Dear Resa and Rebecca, Leyster was exceptional in displaying a rare gift for painting at such an early age. Her artwork is beautiful! Thank you for bringing her to light. I’ve truly enjoy your series on women in the arts. I look forward to your next endeavor, a worthy project indeed. Well done ! Sending love to you two.

    xoxoxo

    1. Dear Holly,

      Yes! I’m always floored when I hear about people who just seem to know/understand how to do something without any kind or very little training.

      ~ he wrote his first symphony at 8 ~ that kind of thing.

      Leyster understood light and shadow. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been asked -okay, where’s the light coming from?

      Her gift produced unique work, appreciable through the ages. Like your poetry, instinctive and special.

      xoxoxoxo

      1. It’s really a bit shocking but wonderful to discover these prodigies! I was standing behind the door when that was passed out :). This young lady is truly gifted with the ability to paint so beautifully. It’s a joy to learn of these talented ladies from the past who at the time were not given due credit. My hats off to you and Rebecca for bringing this to the forefront and allowing us to recognize this amazing lady that painted such lovely art for us to enjoy. Thank you my dears and thank you for always being a source of encouragement to me and so many others. You are truly appreciated and loved.
        xoxoxoxoxo

        1. You are appreciated and loved too, Meece!
          I’m wild about you.
          My feelings for you resemble an artist’s palette with many intriguing colours on it!

          xoxoxoxoxo

            1. Yay…you too!

              2 beams of light, created by Meece with flashlights in dark alleys rooting out RATS!

              What was the name you came up with for the bad guys? I can’t find the comment.

              xoxo🤍🕊🌹

    2. I agree wholeheartedly with Resa, when she states that your poetry is instinctive and special. You capture the nuance of emotional highs and lows and everything in between. I just have to add a paragraph from your “Cafe Rose” published 2 days ago:

      “When I first arrived begonias the color of Indian summer lined the narrow streets and wrought iron lamps lit the sultry night. There was mystery in hushed sounds of silvery shadows barely visible among the weeping willows along the riverbank.”

      I was there with you, Holly!!!! But I digress….

      Judith Leyster’s vibrant and enthusiastic creativity goes to the heart of life.

      1. I wish I could draw/paint better. I always see an image, a painting, a vivid memory when I read her work.
        Now, I did do a series of drawings on some of her “Sad Cafe” series. However…If I could paint… I think it would be the start of a movement – the way I see it.

      2. Dear Rebecca, you are so kind and generous and so truly appreciated, thank you for all your inspiration and encouragement.
        I have totally enjoyed this series you and Resa have collaborated. It’s excellent and a learning experience. These ladies deserve recognition and you and Resa have given them a fine tribute. I love that.
        I am looking forward to future projects that you two ladies bring us, very excited!
        Take care my dear, sending love!
        💗

  4. Thank you for another interesting post on a female artist. I have heard of Leyster. I just checked the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and they have her “The Last Drop,” which I have seen. However, I really didn’t know anything about her.

    Misattribution seems common in art for both women and men. But women’s discoveries and contributions have been overlooked in so many fields–in the arts and in science.

    1. Merril,

      You are welcome! I love all these women artists I’ve been discovering.

      I just looked up “The Last Drop”. Wow! Besides being a uniquely Leyster style painting, there is a message, one that stands today.

      How fortunate you are to have seen it in real life.

      Yes, I’ve only recently learned that it was common for art produced by artists training/apprenticing under a master, to be credited to the master. It makes sense the sciences would follow. Of course that is a bit different from someone just signing their name over someone else’s.

      Rebecca has helped me learn about these artists. Otherwise I would just be posting the pics I took, with credits. Lol… that’s 6 self portraits + several other works – done! There were 325 at the show.

        1. 325 paintings, (a few laces, tapestries & crafts from the 1400’s) not all self portraits. However, all paintings and other works were done by women.
          There’s even a section of nudes.

          Rebecca is going to help learn about Catherine Brandinn and Geertruydt Roghman, who documented the working poor. (about 7 engravings in the exhibition)
          There is so much more.
          Religious paintings & Mythological paintings are many.

          Still life, floral and botany, portraits of men by women and royalty .. it’s fabulous what women documented.
          Lots to learn!

    2. Oh, Merril, I am beyond delighted that you introduced me to “The Last Drop”. I headed over to Google Arts & Culture (another one of my go-to places) and found this link: https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/the-last-drop-the-gay-cavalier/jQFwU75CW1UQgQ?hl=en

      The first time I heard about Judith Leyster was when I visited the Rijksmuseum virtually via their YouTube channel. She was miles ahead of her time.

      Resa has an amazing way of bringing together a community to celebrate creativity from diverse perspectives – from art, to poetry, to music, to books. It has been an absolute honour to be a part of Making Her Mark. I learned a great deal from this collaboration.

      2. Thank you for your post and for the comment, Rebecca. I can’t say I love all her work, but I do think The Last Drop is interesting. I knew her name, so I looked it up at the Phila. museum, and when I saw the painting I remember it. It’s in the permanent collection, but I think it must have been in an exhibition I’ve seen fairly recently.

  5. Thank you both for another discovery of a fabulous painter, even if her gender has made her then kind of eclipsed, so thanks to shed light, hope there will be another serie or another project, always interesting to read along the morning coffee..:)

    1. Eclipsed then, but not now.

      Thank you Jean Marc! There will be a lot more posts about the art of women that were “eclipsed”. I’d love it if Rebecca helped with more, but for sure she’s on with Catherine Brandinn and Geertruydt Roghman.

      I’m so happy you are enjoying this series on women’s art 1400 – 1800.

      xo

    2. I am reading your comment along with my morning coffee, Jean Marc. Of one thing we can be certain – Resa always goes above and beyond to bring us something new to learn, to experience, to enjoy and remember. So pleased you enjoyed this series.

  6. Last one?! This series is so precious, Resa and Rebecca and fully enjoyed them. I can only say that I look forward to a new series.
    Another wonderful tribute to a master painter. On a side note… wow look at all those paintbrushes she’s holding!
    Love and hugs to both!
    xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo

    1. Dahling,

      Yes, the last in Self Portraits, but not the last article. There were 325 works by women, mostly paintings, some drawings and engravings… from the 1400’s some hand crafts (2 tapestries that are hard to believe).

      Yes, I noticed all of the brushes. Perhaps if I held more when I painted, I’d be a better painter? Lol!

      Rebecca has been the perfect person for me to colab with on this series.

      xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox

      1. Oh, I love that and can’t wait to see!
        As for the paintbrushes, no, I don’t think that the multitude of them makes one a better painter. I love the challenge of painting with just one brush! 😉
        Rebecca is amazing and I agree about her being perfect colab for the series.
        xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo

    2. I felt the same way, Marina! Is it really the last one?…..sigh. Resa’s ideas are so exciting that it is hard to see something come to an end. But never fear, our intrepid Resa has so many great ideas that there is never, ever an end to the fun at her place. Every time I stop by, I am encouraged to be creative and look for ways to add joy to our world. Sending much love back your way, Marina – as you said “art towards a happy day.”

    1. I absolutely love working on this series with Rebecca.

      Next we are doing Catherine Brandinn and Geertruydt Roghman. After that? Perhaps she’ll join me for anther topic? Lots to chose from!

      Yes, marginalization of women is a blot. It seems marginalizing, not just women, but other demographics was a way of the past. This seems to be evolving, but it is definitely not a steady forwards movement.

      Adore your input Dave. Thank you so much!

    2. Thank you Dave, for your heartwarming comments. Resa has the best ideas and welcomes us all to participate in seeking a creative experience. I have truly learned and enjoyed this collaboration. As I look back into history, I try to pinpoint why there has been a gender disparity. Everyone has an idea, but it still is a very complex discussion. Men have traditionally held positions of power and influence. They had the ability to promote their work more effectively and shape the narrative surrounding historical achievements. Resa’s “Making her Mark” has identified this bias and has given us a glimpse of what women achieved. This collaboration has given me great comfort because we are forging new discussions surrounding the history of art. Exciting stuff!

      1. You’re welcome, Rebecca! I guess a big reason for gender disparity has been that men historically want(ed) more than their share of power, control, wealth, fame, etc. 😦

      2. Gender disparity probably began with the fact that women bore the children. Death in childbirth was common. Women had to stay home with the children. Life was a lot harder & shorter.

        Religious beliefs?

        Men had the upper hand. Many won’t cede it, to this day. Worst case example, Afghanistan.

        It goes beyond the sexes… unfortunately, and into the races.

  8. Judith is new to me and what an interesting woman and artist she seems. she appears to be quite a lively soul from her picture. must have been so incredibly hard to be a creative woman during these times

    1. Beth,

      Yes, her artwork is unique, truly a defined style. I am intrigued. I think just being a woman was difficult, but advancing in the arts must have been defeating before any get go.

      The fact that Leyster was only 1 of 2 women be let into “Haarlem’s painters’ guild during the entire 17th century Netherlands”is a testament to her ability. The fact that a man signed his name over hers, to claim authorship, is another type of testament.

    2. I am so pleased you enjoyed this post, Beth. I agree – I think that Judith Leyster was a very lively soul. Anyone who had the courage to challenge gender norms and expectations in her time was truly one of a kind. I believe her vital personality came through in her depictions of everyday life – scenes that we can relate to, in our time. The more I read about her, the more I recognized that her themes of individuality and empowerment reflected her life.

  9. What a wonderful interview with Rebecca! Thank you for bringing to light the art of Judith Leyster. I love the self-portrait; it’s so confident, yet playful and intriguing as well. Your series of women in the arts is really amazing, I enjoyed this a lot and look forward to the next one. Thanks to you both for sharing! 🎨 💛💙💚

    1. I’m going to have to go back and catch up on the other Making Her Mark self portraits in the series, as this was wonderful! Rebecca clearly knows her stuff, what a knowledgeable lady! A great collaboration and contribution to the art scene. You must both be very pleased indeed xxxx

      1. Oh wow! It’s easy to catch up. The first image on the sidebar is Making Her Mark.

        Click on that! It links to all of the posts so far.

        It was the most fantastic exhibition of art. I didn’t want to leave. It felt like I could have lived in the art gallery!

        It’s a great show, that should have travelled the world. Alas, it only showed in 2 cities, Toronto and Baltimore.

        Thanks Ada!

      2. In 2009, I was on the 5th floor of the Musee d’Orsay. It was a quiet day and I was alone. As I viewed the impressionists, I started to cry. It was then that I realized that I had not given much time or consequence to art. I was so busy with my career, that I simply didn’t give any thought to creative pursuits. That was the day that I determined that I would start my creative journey. It has been remarkable. Resa’s invitation to join her on Making her Mark was been truly life-affirming.

    2. Thank you Ada! I’m so happy you are enjoying. the series.

      It’s being a thrill of my life doing these art posts with Rebecca.

      I look forward to our next project!

      🕊🤍

  11. She really was very talented, no wonder her work was stolen in Misattribution.. I am delighted that her truth worth as a wonderful artist has been recognised..
    And it does in fact make you think, along the lines as you said in your post Resa, how many other artists have perhaps done the same to other peoples works. Especially women, who have been were not revered during that time, treated lesser than man, throughout our historical gathering of knowledge..

    I enjoyed the links, and your clever split photo of the two camera shots of the same painting image…. I loved the ” Happy Couple” painting, very jolly.. 🙂

    Thank you Resa and Rebecca, for sharing your love of art, and for all the information about Judith, she was a first for me too.. 🙂 xx ❤ ✨💖

    1. Sue!

      Yes, no wonder. Her style is distinctive, and brilliantly executed.

      Hopefully as time goes by, more women from the past will finally stand in their light, the one they shone in their lifetime.

      Yay! I’m thrilled someone noted the split “Image Compare” of the 2 photos. Taking pics of art is a true challenge, especially other artists’ work. If it’s not shadows, it’s light, if it’s not full framing, it’s aspects. Anyway, I try.

      As eyes are the windows to the soul, art is the doorway to the home of the soul.

      Thank you for your generous comment, Sue! 🕊🤍xoxo🕊🤍

    2. I am delighted that you enjoyed this post. Resa has the best ideas. Making her Mark reminds us all to seek a creative journey in our personal lives. Many thanks for your insightful comments, Sue.

  12. This was absolutely fascinating. I’d never heard of her SO I thank you ladies for putting her centre stage here and letting her speak in a way. Also really interesting to see that artworks have been miscredited.

    1. Thanks for reading and enjoying, Shey! Leyster’s style is definitive. I’m thrilled she is reclaiming herself, standing in her light.

      Advances in technology will help re-attribute many paintings, where signatures have been painted over, and other painting tricks and talents could be fudging the truth.

      Others may require something else… may never give credit where due.
      xxxxx

    2. I knew you would like Judith, Shey. I felt that she could be one of your characters. She certainly took on the world – any prevailed. The funny thing about history, is that truth does win out. It may take time, but history is relentless.

  13. Timothy Price's avatar Timothy Price

    Judith Leyster waas a master. What a creative self-portrait. You twp make the best interesting and informative posts.

    1. Rebecca is very thorough and organized. She’s perfect for me in a colab sense.
      Also, we are both art crazy, the common bond.
      Thanks Tim! xx

    2. I agree wholeheartedly, Tim. Judith Leyster was a master. Resa has the best ideas and I was thrilled to join her on this profound and memorable journey. I think that our trees at your place gave us a special magic to work together. Sending hugs to all.

  14. lovely post, Resa and Rebecca. I have always loved the Dutch masters and the information about misattribution was very fascinating. Judith is a great and it is good to see her featured here.

    1. Many thanks for heartwarming comments, John. I am just beginning to explore Dutch painters, particularly during the Golden Age, which is a good place to start. They have a remarkable ability to use light and shadow to create a sense of depth and realism. I especially appreciate their focus on everyday life, detailed still lifes, and intimate portraits. When I view their paintings, I am taken back to 17th-century Dutch society. I think that Resa’s thought “art remembers us” captures the essence of what art “gifts” us.

    2. Thank you, dear John!

      I love exploring these relatively unknown female artists with Rebecca. It is intellectually stimulating and satisfying.

      Misattribution. …. a kind word.

      🎨𝔛

    1. Yes, Leyster was a pioneering talent, not just as a woman, but artist in general. Her style is unique, in a league of its own. 💓🕊🤍💓

  16. Of course, and unfortunately, I never heard; what a shame!! Nevertheless, friends like you are encouraged to kick our acknowledgements. Thank you, dear Resa.🤙🙏💖
    Did you notice in your posts that many women from Holland have done brave work in this kind of art?☺🌹✌

    1. Thanks for popping by and reading the article, Aladin!
      Well, we are hearing about these women now. I’m thrilled. The exhibit should have travelled to more places. It only was shown in 2 cities. I’m thankful Toronto was one of those cities. Baltimore was the other.
      Yes, the Netherlands seems to have had a good share of early female artists. Once we hit the 1700’s, things change a bit.

      Of course the 1800’s marked huge changes in allowing women to openly be artists, and writers. We know many of these names and their work.

      This exhibit strove to highlight women from 1400 – 1800 in Europe.

    3. A very insightful comment, my dear friend. Yes, I did notice that many women from Holland challenged the boundaries of gender. I am so pleased you enjoyed this series. I’ve just returned from a blog break so am catching up with my reading. See you on the reader!

    1. I share your thought on how women are becoming acknowledge for their gifts. We live in exciting times!!! Your thought reminded me of a quote by Georgia O’Keeffe: “I found I could say things with color and shapes that I couldn’t say any other way—things I had no words for.” Judith and Georgia – speaking from different times in history – are in sync.

  18. Sadly – men taking credit for their wives or sisters or daughter’s work has happened repeatedly in history. The reason artists paint self-portraits is generally because they can’t afford to pay a professional to sit. In my experience – friends and family make terrible subjects – they can’t sit still or they make funny faces.

    1. True, Jan!

      There’s a fab move about Margret Keane, who did the famous wide-eyed paintings in the 50’s & 60’s.

      “Margaret Keane is an American painter best known for her distinctive portraits of children with oversized eyes. Her former husband, Walter Keane, took credit for her work until their divorce in 1965, when she was forced to take him to court to prove she was the actual artist responsible.“

      Way back, it was almost impossible for a woman to take her husband to court.

      Ha! Love your take on self portraits. It is hard to sit still for hours. I commend you for having tried painting from real life models, even if they made faces. Lol!

    2. You made an excellent point, Trent. I agree – when they discovered the real artists, they should have paid more!! History has set the record straight. It took a long time, but history has a way of bringing out truth. So glad that you enjoyed this post. I had so much fun collaborating with Resa!!

    3. Thank you for your insightful comments, Jan! The systemic undervaluation of women’s contributions has persisted over the centuries! Legally, women were often denied rights to property and recognition in public life, making it easier for men to claim their successes as their own. Shame on them!!!

  20. I thoroughly enjoyed learning about Judith Leyster and her work. What a talent! And what a shame that some of her paintings were wrongly attributed to men. I watched the video on Resa’s site. I love the term “wall power.” That painting has wall power. I hope I can find occasion to use it in casual conversation.

    1. Happy you liked the post, Liz!

      Wall power, I’m sure you will use it soon.

      Rebecca does the best research. My head has gained a couple of pounds since we started colabbing.

      My waist gained a bit, too, but I cant blame that on Rebecca!

    2. Thank you Liz for joining us in celebrating the rich legacy of Judith Leyster. What I love about history and serendipity is that truth does come out. Sometimes it takes many years. I was especially interested in Judith’s business acumen. She had her own studio and taught several student. I read that she had an interesting way of signing her paintings. Leyster means “Lode Star”. She was described as a “leading star” in art.

  21. Wow. I was stunned by the misattribution of her work. “This systematic misattribution essentially meant the erasure of women from the art historical canon, which eventually resulted in their erasure from history itself.” OMG, that makes me so mad! I’m sure it happened all the time through history – the astonishing work of women (and non-white people) stolen by white men. I’m not very happy with the misogynist crowd right now. Thank you, Resa and Rebecca, for sharing Leyster’s history and her impact on the art world. I shall be exploring more of her work.

    1. Yes, it is maddening.
      However, it is not only an old story.
      Do you know the story of Margaret Keane? Tim Burton made a movie.

      She was the artist who did the BIG EYES paintings in the 50’s & 60’s.

      She had an 1986 court battle with ex-husband Walter Keane, in which she proved that he was fraudulently claiming her work as his own.

      The trial ended when the judge asked them both to do a big eye drawing while everyone watched. The movie is quite good.

      Yes, women must keep claiming their rights, in this world. The journey, the fight, is far from over. xx

    2. I am delighted that you enjoyed meeting up with Judith Leyster, Diana. The more I explore women’s role in history, the more I am grateful for courageous women who chose to defy a system that looked down on them. They led a difficult life – and their legacy benefits us today. With ever ounce of our strength, may we follow in their footsteps.

  22. Great post. Far too often men have been credited with the work of women, in ALL the arts. So glad you brought her out of the darkness. Wonderful job and so sorry to know this is the final one. Congratulations on a series well done. ❤️

    1. Gi,

      It’s true, and I hear there has been a lot of misattribution (a kind word) in the sciences as well.

      It is the final self portraits post, but there’s lots of art posts on women artists that have been in the shadows in the coming months. I took LOTS of pics at the Making her Mark show, and I will share amap! xoxoxo

    2. I am delighted that you enjoyed this post, Gi. I agree wholeheartedly – it is good to bring Judith out of the darkness. I have learned so much from this collaboration with Resa!

      1. I’ve also learned a lot.
        Without words, art has documented much of the past. I’ve also learned that history is not written in stone. It’s written by human’s, mostly men until recently.

  23. Hi Resa and Rebecca, while it is a great thing that Judith Leyster’s work is not getting its due credit, it is appalling that it was incorrectly attributed in the first place. Sometimes you really have to wonder at how this world has been run, both historically and even now. I really find it hard to understand how it makes sense to push one gender down and suppress the intelligence and creativity of half the world population. There is documented proof that the children (including the sons) of women who are not educated are negatively impacted by this.

    1. Robbie,

      Agree!
      It does appear that many ideas, such as marginalizing women through suppressing education (as per your example) and other attempts at keeping other areas of humanity down, work against the greater good and well being of society.

      Yet, somehow I think that is precisely the reason. Keep the rich and powerful on top, while the rest flounder.

      Man has struggled against absolute power, for eons.
      The crazy thing is…. there are only a few at the top. We have the people power, yet…..?

      It is very intriguing to chat with you! Love it!

      1. Yes, that does fit with how the rich and powerful think. It is also why during revolutions and political coups, all the intellectuals are imprisoned or murdered. Sadly, it is always the worst people who achieve power as you need to trample over others to get there. Only certain personalities can do that, some of which are carefully molded from the cradle.

        1. What a world!
          Your comment is dead on.
          It is unfortunate, as so many more could live better lives.
          It’s enough that there’s droughts, floods, tornados, volcanoes and other natural impediments to a happy life.

          Onward! xox🕊🤍

    2. Robbie – I think you were at the Rijksmuseum a few months ago. I can only imagine how exciting it was to enter the doors to this amazing building full of the most glorious artwork!!!

  24. Cool that she was finally recognized, though too bad it took a couple of centuries. My opinion, when they discovered the real artist, the buyer should have had to pay more instead of getting a partial refund – I am sure her paintings were harder to find than Frans’ paintings, or at least were until the correct attribution was placed on them…

    I’m sorry to see the end of the series. It has been fun and I’ve learned a lot about several artists I didn’t know before.

    1. You made an excellent point, Trent. I agree – when they discovered the real artists, they should have paid more!! History has set the record straight. It took a long time, but history has a way of bringing out truth. So glad that you enjoyed this post. I had so much fun collaborating with Resa!!

      1. It was a great series 🙂 I hope you and Resa can do more collaborations in the future.
        History is setting the record straight, but I am sure there are many “lost” artists out there that will hopefully be brought to light some day.

    2. YES! How cool would that have been? Charge more! It is after all like finding hidden treasure.

      It has been a fab series on Self Portraits.
      However, other series to come. There’s a lot of paintings on mythology, a slew of religious, nudes, more and other arts women did.. tapestry, lace making, china design, hair and paper art. (mostly 1400-1600)
      I’m thinking a bit different about how to present those.

      Anyway; next, Rebecca and I have 1 or 2 posts, depending on length of info gathered, on documentation of the poor.

      Lots more to learn. I’m so excited!

  25. Fantastic post!! Thanks Resa and Rebecca for introducing me to Judith Leyster. I’ve really enjoyed your ‘Making her Mark’ series, Resa, you asked such great questions! I appreciate you both for highlighting marginalized artists who didn’t get their proper due, I’m sure there are more of them out there, sadly.

    1. I am so pleased you enjoyed this post, Ruth. Resa’s series “Making her Mark” opened the doors to exciting discoveries for me. This collaboration reminded me that we need to appreciate and feature artists of today. Resa is a leader in this area of endeavour!

  27. Pingback: Making Her Mark – Self Portraits VI – PixelHub

  29. Wow, what a fascinating discover. I loved this post. And sadly I have to wonder why so many artists and writers are only claimed to fame after they die. I’ve seen a few documentaries on stolen art and how they go about finding the truth. Fascinating ladies! Hugs ❤ xxx

    P.S. Have you left Twatter Resa? I noticed a lot of creatives leaving there and going to Blue Sky. I’m going to join. How do you get the share button on your page? ❤ xx

    1. Thank you, Debby! I’m quite happy about the series on women artists.

      SO

      Yes, I am on Blue Sky. I left X.. . Axed X!

      Follow me there @resalis.bsky.social

      So, the Button for Blue Sky on your WP blog is:

      Dashboard ➞ Tools ➞ Marketing

      In Marketing there is a menu across the top.

      Marketing Tools – Connections – Traffic – Sharing Buttons

      Click on Sharing Buttons.

      Scroll down and you will see EDIT SHARING BUTTONS & +”MORE” BUTTON

      Click on +”MORE” BUTTON

      You will see a selection of Buttons you can add. Click on Blue Sky. You will see it added in your already existing Button Choices just above. If you want to get rid of a Button, click on EDIT SHARING BUTTONS.

      Make sure to save your changes!

      xoxoxoxoxox

      1. Yay! Thank you so much Resa. I’m on it! And I have noticed a slew of writers and artists leaving Twitter, like a mass exodus, lol. I just joined blue sky and will spend some time this week checking it out, how it works, but I’m there and following you!! Now off to work with your instructions. Thank you!!! Hugs ❤ xxx ❤

  30. Thanks for introducing me to Judith, Resa and Rebecca! Learning about her was fascinating and she was talented at such a young age. I loved reading that she “ventured beyond the typical subject matter embraced by Dutch painters of her time.” Sadly, I wasn’t shocked to read about the misattribution which is beyond horrible. Another incredible discovery that I enjoyed learning about! Thanks for your interesting and wonderful dialogue! ❤️🌷❤️

    1. I wasn’t shocked that a man had been credited with her work either.
      Many women artists (and some men) are finally getting their due.
      It’s unfortunate that this art Exhibition “Making Her Mark” -all women’s art 1400- 1800 was only showed in 2 cities.(Toronto & Baltimore) It was eye opening.
      Anyway, other posts of art from the show coming, on other topics. (Religious paintings, mythology, nudes, aristocracy, etc.)
      xo🎨❦🌹xo

      1. That’s the tragedy though, Resa, that we’re not shocked because it happens too often. I’m so tired of women having to work harder to prove themselves. Sigh. That is too bad about showing only in two cities. But I look forward to more amazing posts on the subject from you. I love how you open our eyes to history in the arts. xoxoxo 🎨🖌️❤️

        1. Thank you Lauren!
          Never mind work harder, in some countries just to survive a woman gives her life.
          Okay, I need to send you a mail!
          xoxoxo

    1. We are all learning about much from the past, especially about women.
      Their accomplishments have been hidden. Now, they are becoming known.
      Thank you so much for popping by, and reading!
      🌟❦❦

  34. Pingback: Making Her Mark – Self Portraits VI – ICT blog

  36. Pingback: Making Her Mark – Self Portraits VI - Madam Kings

  39. Judith Leyster was such a fascinating artist and such a visual painter she was. Her work was ahead of its time. I watched on Google her portrait painting and wow! so much detail in her work. Very almost hyperreal paintings. 🙂

Comments are closed.