Welcome to the final instalment of Making Her Mark – Self Portraits. I’m here with Rebecca Budd, curator of Chasing Art. 

Resa – So, Rebecca, in this last Self Portraits post, we are headed to the Netherlands, 17th century, to visit another artist that I had never heard of. Had you heard of Judith Leyster before this post?

Rebecca – Yes – just recently. I discovered her when I travelled virtually to the Rijksmuseum. Judith Leyster was featured in their Women of the Rijksmuseum exhibit two years ago. It was an eye-opening experience to discover her work.

Resa – Very Cool, I’m excited to se what you’ve dug up!

Once Forgotten Dutch Master

Judith Leyster, the once-forgotten Dutch master, has experienced a resurgence in recognition. She was commemorated in a  Google Doodle, her artwork achieved higher- than-expected prices at auction, and she was featured in the most prestigious chamber of the Rijksmuseum.

Who Was Judith Leyster

A remarkable Dutch painter of the 17th century, Judith Leyster was born 1609, in Haarlem, Netherlands. The daughter of a brewer, she displayed a precocious talent for painting from a young age.

By the age of 24, Leyster had achieved the remarkable feat of becoming a member of the Haarlem painters’ guild, marking her official recognition as a masterful artist. She was one of the rare professional women painters of her time, being one of only two women accepted as a master in Haarlem’s painters’ guild during the entire 17th century Netherlands.

Leyster’s artistic talent quickly gained recognition, and she became known for her lively and expressive compositions, often depicting genre scenes, portraits, and still life paintings. Her work radiated a sense of spontaneity and skillful use of light and shadow, showcasing her technical prowess and innovative approach to painting.

Leyster’s artistic pursuits defied conventions, as she ventured beyond the typical subject matter embraced by Dutch painters of her time. Her work encompassed a diverse range, and she was among the pioneering artists who explored and popularized the domestic genre scene, portraying everyday life with a fresh perspective.

In the early 1630s, before her marriage to the lesser-known artist Jan Miense Moleanaer, Leyster produced some of her most significant works. However, despite her talent and dedication to her craft, her contributions to art history remained largely unrecognized until the late 19th century.

Judith Leyster Rediscovered

The rediscovery of Leyster’s significance in the art world came about during a lawsuit between an art dealer and his vendor.

It was revealed that many works attributed to her contemporary and rumoured rival, the great Dutch painter Frans Hals, were, in fact, Leyster’s creations that had been incorrectly credited. This significant discovery brought long-overdue attention to Leyster’s remarkable talent and her influential role in shaping the Dutch Golden Age of art.

It is remarkable how the true authorship of artworks can be uncovered through careful examination and historical investigation. The discovery of Leyster’s initials hidden beneath a faked signature of Frans Hals in “The Happy Couple” (aka The Carousing Couple) serves as a testament to her enduring impact on art history and the need for ongoing reassessment of attributions.

This revelation not only sheds light on Leyster’s artistic contribution but also prompts a re-evaluation of artworks attributed to her contemporaries. It further underscores the significance of ongoing research in uncovering the often overlooked achievements of pioneering artists.

Resa – When searching for other female artists from the past whose art has been misattributed, I found an intriguing article (July/2024) in  Daily Art Magazine. The article cites 5 female artists.

“This systematic misattribution essentially meant the erasure of women from the art historical canon, which eventually resulted in their erasure from history itself.”

Rebecca, do you think it’s possible that as art experts and historians uncover yet more misattributed art that we could see some famous paintings by famous artists, the Rembrandts, Da Vincis, et al being reattributed to women?

Rebecca – You have asked a very insightful question, Resa! It’s certainly possible. As more art is studied works that have been misattributed may be finally recognized as contributions of women artists. It would be a significant shift in how we view art history. I truly believe that we are now embarking on an extraordinary exploration of art history. It gives me great comfort that we are seeking to foster a richer and more equitable understanding of the artistic legacy we inherit. I am glad that you mentioned the Daily Art Magazine. It is one of my go-to places to learn about art.

Judith Leyster’s Self Portrait: A Glimpse into the Artist’s World

Judith Leyster’s self-portrait offers a glimpse into her life and artistry. Created before her admission to the guild in 1633, the portrait encapsulates a moment of confident creativity and engagement. Leyster’s self-assured expression, characterized by a confident smile and parted lips as if to speak, exudes a sense of self-assurance and mastery. The casual pose, with one arm nonchalantly resting on the back of her chair, hints at the artist’s ease and comfort in her own studio.

It is difficult to photograph art. I captured many works beautifully. However, this painting was the finale of the show, and was heavily lit with warm light. 

Shot on an angle, the lighting was evaded, and it seems to be closer to many photos of it. Still, it seems no 2 photos are the same.

The liveliness and freedom evident in Leyster’s brushwork mirror her spirited approach to art, capturing a fleeting pause in her work as she glances toward a potential visitor. This subtle interaction suggests a moment of connection with a viewer, possibly a patron, inviting them to share in the experience of a work in progress.

In this self-portrait, Judith Leyster not only presents herself as a skilled artist but also provides a glimpse into the vibrant and dynamic world of creativity that she inhabited.

Today, Judith Leyster is celebrated for her creative spirit, artistic innovation, and lasting impact on the history of art. Her legacy continues to inspire and engage art enthusiasts and scholars around the world.

Resa – Well, Rebecca, so ends our series on Self Portraits. It’s been a pleasure and an honour having you here with me. Thank You!

I look forward to your return, to discuss some engravings on paper by Catherine Brandinn and Geertruydt Roghman. These are of utmost interest as the images depict the working poor, not a big subject of artists in those times.

Rebecca – Thank you, Resa! It has truly been a privilege to explore these amazing women through “Making her Mark” with you. Your photographs allowed me to virtually experience the joy of viewing these paintings. Thank you for celebrating and honouring these artists. Their resilience and creativity continue to inspire and empower us today, even as they provide a vital legacy for future generations of women in the arts.

I’m eagerly anticipating our next discussion on the engravings by Catherine Brandinn and Geertruydt Roghman, as the portrayal of the working poor offers a unique and important perspective that, I believe, deserves more attention in the art world.

As you say so eloquently, “Art Remembers Us.”